123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171 |
- \documentclass[english,aspectratio=43,8pt]{beamer}
- \usepackage{graphicx}
- \usepackage{amssymb}
- \usepackage{booktabs}
- \usepackage{siunitx}
- \usepackage{subcaption}
- \usepackage{marvosym}
- \usepackage{verbatim}
- \usepackage[normalem]{ulem} % Needed for /sout
- \newcommand{\pb}{\si{\pico\barn}}%
- \newcommand{\fb}{\si{\femto\barn}}%
- \newcommand{\invfb}{\si{\per\femto\barn}}
- \newcommand{\GeV}{\si{\giga\electronvolt}}
- \hypersetup{colorlinks=true,urlcolor=blue}
- \usetheme[]{bjeldbak}
- % Note: Z-veto wouldn't really work for Z->tautau
- \begin{document}
- \title[]{Adding Tau Leptons to TTTT X-Section Measurement}
- \author[C. Fangmeier]{\textbf{Caleb Fangmeier}}
- \institute[UNL]{University of Nebraska \-- Lincoln}
- \date{TTTT Working Meeting | January 25, 2018}
- \titlegraphic{%
- \begin{figure}
- \includegraphics[width=1in]{CMSlogo.png}\hspace{0.75in}\includegraphics[width=1in]{nebraska-n.png}
- \end{figure}
- }
- \begin{frame}[plain]
- \titlepage
- %
- \end{frame}
- \begin{frame}{Introduction}
- \begin{itemize}
- \item \textbf{Goal:} Investigate how the TTTT cross-section measurement could be improved by adding taus to the lepton selection.
- \item To avoid the work of modifying the existing analysis looper to include taus, a simple ``mock''\footnote{\url{https://github.com/cfangmeier/FTAnalysis/tree/tau_studies/studies/tau}} analysis was implemented from scratch which attempts to replicate the main features of the real analysis.
- \item Runs on same \texttt{CMS4} nTuples as existing analysis.
- \end{itemize}
- \end{frame}
- \begin{frame}{Mock Analysis 2016 Yields}
- \begin{columns}
- \begin{column}{0.4\textwidth}
- \begin{itemize}
- \item Attempt to replicate AN yields with mock analysis using only electrons and muons
- \item Generally overestimate yield (wrt analysis note)by 10-30\%. (However this doesn't include any scale factors)
- \item But shapes tend to match, so go ahead and add taus to make a comparison.
- \item All data normalized to 35.9 $\mathrm{fb}^{-1}$.
- \end{itemize}
- \end{column}
- \begin{column}{0.59\textwidth}
- \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figures/Yield_Ignoring_Taus.png}
- \end{column}
- \end{columns}
- \end{frame}
- \begin{frame}{Tau Selection}
- \begin{itemize}
- \item Taus to be considered in the SS pair must pass the following requirements
- \begin{itemize}
- \item Pass the ID: \texttt{byTightIsolationMVArun2v1DBdR03oldDMwLT}
- \item Have $P_{T}>20$GeV
- \item Isolated ($dR>0.4$) from any electrons or muons that pass their respective selection criteria
- \end{itemize}
- \item Generator-Level taus used in truth-matching must:
- \begin{itemize}
- \item Be flagged as prompt (ie. \texttt{tas::genps\_fromHardProcessDecayed()==1})
- \item Decay hadronically ($\tau^\pm \rightarrow\pi^\pm \{\pi_0\}$, $\tau^\pm \rightarrow\pi^\pm\pi^\pm\pi^\mp\{\pi_0\}$)
- \end{itemize}
- \item A reconstructed tau is considered truth-matched if it is within $dR<0.3$ of a generator-level tau
- \item Otherwise taus are treated exactly the same as electrons and muons in the SS-pair construction/Z-Veto/Jet-Cleaning.
- \end{itemize}
- \end{frame}
- \begin{frame}{Yields/Truth Matching}
- \begin{columns}
- \begin{column}{0.5\textwidth}
- \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figures/Yield_For_events_with_0_Tau.png}
- \end{column}
- \begin{column}{0.5\textwidth}
- \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figures/Yield_For_events_with_1_Tau.png}
- \end{column}
- \end{columns}
- \begin{itemize}
- \item Above figures show yields when there are zero selected taus(left) or one selected tau(right).
- \item Orange Lines show yields when the tau is required to be truth-matched.
- \item About 60\% of taus are fakes!
- \item Adding taus is clearly not helpful at all in SS regions(1-6), but maybe helpful in multi-lepton regions(7-8)
- \end{itemize}
- \end{frame}
- \begin{frame}{Cross-Checking Truth Matching}
- \begin{columns}
- \begin{column}{0.4\textwidth}
- \begin{itemize}
- \item Previous slide indicates $\approx60-70$\% of taus are fakes.
- \item Figure shows the yields for events in any SR broken down by \# of generator-level taus and \# of selected taus.
- \item The figure on the right corroborates the previous slide; In TTTT, for example, only about 40\% of events with 1 selected tau have 1 or more real taus.
- \end{itemize}
- \end{column}
- \begin{column}{0.6\textwidth}
- \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figures/Generated_tau_vs_Selected_tau.png}
- \end{column}
- \end{columns}
- \end{frame}
- \begin{frame}{Results with Expanded Binning}
- \begin{columns}
- \begin{column}{0.5\textwidth}
- \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figures/Yield_For_events_with_0_Tau_NewSR.png}
- \end{column}
- \begin{column}{0.5\textwidth}
- \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figures/Yield_For_events_with_1_Tau_NewSR.png}
- \end{column}
- \end{columns}
- \begin{itemize}
- \item Ongoing investigation of more fine binning\footnote{\url{https://github.com/cfangmeier/FTAnalysis/blob/tau\_studies/studies/tau/Yield.C#L261}}.
- \item Same conclusions: SS show no gain, and multilepton may give marginal improvements
- \end{itemize}
- \end{frame}
- \begin{frame}{Conclusions}
- \begin{itemize}
- \item Investigated any benefit to including taus in measurement.
- \item With current tau selection no gain in SS
- \item Possibly very small (few percent) gain in multilepton categories
- \item Large amount of work needed to create data-driven estimate of fake-tau background
- \item Propose to document this and shelve it for now
- \end{itemize}
- \end{frame}
- \begin{frame}{Backup - Tau Reco Performance}
- \begin{columns}
- \begin{column}{0.5\textwidth}
- \begin{figure}
- \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figures/Tau_Efficiency.png}
- \end{figure}
- \centering
- Tau Selection Efficiency (reco + id + $P_T>20\mathrm{GeV}$)
- \end{column}
- \begin{column}{0.5\textwidth}
- \begin{figure}
- \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figures/Tau_Purity.png}
- \end{figure}
- \centering
- Tau Purity (matched w/ generator-level tau at $\delta R<0.3$)
- \end{column}
- \end{columns}
- \end{frame}
- \begin{frame}{Backup - Truth Matching Identity}
- \begin{figure}
- \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figures/Truth_Matching.png}
- \end{figure}
- \centering
- Tau Selection Efficiency (reco + id + $P_T>20\mathrm{GeV}$)
- \begin{itemize}
- \item \textbf{Note: } The flag for picking generator final state particles doesn't actually include the hadronic particles so it's likely that many of the ``Nothing'' taus really belong in the ``Hadron'' category. (Will be fixed in future)
- \end{itemize}
- \end{frame}
- \end{document}
|