main.tex 7.5 KB

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171
  1. \documentclass[english,aspectratio=43,8pt]{beamer}
  2. \usepackage{graphicx}
  3. \usepackage{amssymb}
  4. \usepackage{booktabs}
  5. \usepackage{siunitx}
  6. \usepackage{subcaption}
  7. \usepackage{marvosym}
  8. \usepackage{verbatim}
  9. \usepackage[normalem]{ulem} % Needed for /sout
  10. \newcommand{\pb}{\si{\pico\barn}}%
  11. \newcommand{\fb}{\si{\femto\barn}}%
  12. \newcommand{\invfb}{\si{\per\femto\barn}}
  13. \newcommand{\GeV}{\si{\giga\electronvolt}}
  14. \hypersetup{colorlinks=true,urlcolor=blue}
  15. \usetheme[]{bjeldbak}
  16. % Note: Z-veto wouldn't really work for Z->tautau
  17. \begin{document}
  18. \title[]{Adding Tau Leptons to TTTT X-Section Measurement}
  19. \author[C. Fangmeier]{\textbf{Caleb Fangmeier}}
  20. \institute[UNL]{University of Nebraska \-- Lincoln}
  21. \date{TTTT Working Meeting | January 25, 2018}
  22. \titlegraphic{%
  23. \begin{figure}
  24. \includegraphics[width=1in]{CMSlogo.png}\hspace{0.75in}\includegraphics[width=1in]{nebraska-n.png}
  25. \end{figure}
  26. }
  27. \begin{frame}[plain]
  28. \titlepage
  29. %
  30. \end{frame}
  31. \begin{frame}{Introduction}
  32. \begin{itemize}
  33. \item \textbf{Goal:} Investigate how the TTTT cross-section measurement could be improved by adding taus to the lepton selection.
  34. \item To avoid the work of modifying the existing analysis looper to include taus, a simple ``mock''\footnote{\url{https://github.com/cfangmeier/FTAnalysis/tree/tau_studies/studies/tau}} analysis was implemented from scratch which attempts to replicate the main features of the real analysis.
  35. \item Runs on same \texttt{CMS4} nTuples as existing analysis.
  36. \end{itemize}
  37. \end{frame}
  38. \begin{frame}{Mock Analysis 2016 Yields}
  39. \begin{columns}
  40. \begin{column}{0.4\textwidth}
  41. \begin{itemize}
  42. \item Attempt to replicate AN yields with mock analysis using only electrons and muons
  43. \item Generally overestimate yield (wrt analysis note)by 10-30\%. (However this doesn't include any scale factors)
  44. \item But shapes tend to match, so go ahead and add taus to make a comparison.
  45. \item All data normalized to 35.9 $\mathrm{fb}^{-1}$.
  46. \end{itemize}
  47. \end{column}
  48. \begin{column}{0.59\textwidth}
  49. \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figures/Yield_Ignoring_Taus.png}
  50. \end{column}
  51. \end{columns}
  52. \end{frame}
  53. \begin{frame}{Tau Selection}
  54. \begin{itemize}
  55. \item Taus to be considered in the SS pair must pass the following requirements
  56. \begin{itemize}
  57. \item Pass the ID: \texttt{byTightIsolationMVArun2v1DBdR03oldDMwLT}
  58. \item Have $P_{T}>20$GeV
  59. \item Isolated ($dR>0.4$) from any electrons or muons that pass their respective selection criteria
  60. \end{itemize}
  61. \item Generator-Level taus used in truth-matching must:
  62. \begin{itemize}
  63. \item Be flagged as prompt (ie. \texttt{tas::genps\_fromHardProcessDecayed()==1})
  64. \item Decay hadronically ($\tau^\pm \rightarrow\pi^\pm \{\pi_0\}$, $\tau^\pm \rightarrow\pi^\pm\pi^\pm\pi^\mp\{\pi_0\}$)
  65. \end{itemize}
  66. \item A reconstructed tau is considered truth-matched if it is within $dR<0.3$ of a generator-level tau
  67. \item Otherwise taus are treated exactly the same as electrons and muons in the SS-pair construction/Z-Veto/Jet-Cleaning.
  68. \end{itemize}
  69. \end{frame}
  70. \begin{frame}{Yields/Truth Matching}
  71. \begin{columns}
  72. \begin{column}{0.5\textwidth}
  73. \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figures/Yield_For_events_with_0_Tau.png}
  74. \end{column}
  75. \begin{column}{0.5\textwidth}
  76. \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figures/Yield_For_events_with_1_Tau.png}
  77. \end{column}
  78. \end{columns}
  79. \begin{itemize}
  80. \item Above figures show yields when there are zero selected taus(left) or one selected tau(right).
  81. \item Orange Lines show yields when the tau is required to be truth-matched.
  82. \item About 60\% of taus are fakes!
  83. \item Adding taus is clearly not helpful at all in SS regions(1-6), but maybe helpful in multi-lepton regions(7-8)
  84. \end{itemize}
  85. \end{frame}
  86. \begin{frame}{Cross-Checking Truth Matching}
  87. \begin{columns}
  88. \begin{column}{0.4\textwidth}
  89. \begin{itemize}
  90. \item Previous slide indicates $\approx60-70$\% of taus are fakes.
  91. \item Figure shows the yields for events in any SR broken down by \# of generator-level taus and \# of selected taus.
  92. \item The figure on the right corroborates the previous slide; In TTTT, for example, only about 40\% of events with 1 selected tau have 1 or more real taus.
  93. \end{itemize}
  94. \end{column}
  95. \begin{column}{0.6\textwidth}
  96. \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figures/Generated_tau_vs_Selected_tau.png}
  97. \end{column}
  98. \end{columns}
  99. \end{frame}
  100. \begin{frame}{Results with Expanded Binning}
  101. \begin{columns}
  102. \begin{column}{0.5\textwidth}
  103. \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figures/Yield_For_events_with_0_Tau_NewSR.png}
  104. \end{column}
  105. \begin{column}{0.5\textwidth}
  106. \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figures/Yield_For_events_with_1_Tau_NewSR.png}
  107. \end{column}
  108. \end{columns}
  109. \begin{itemize}
  110. \item Ongoing investigation of more fine binning\footnote{\url{https://github.com/cfangmeier/FTAnalysis/blob/tau\_studies/studies/tau/Yield.C#L261}}.
  111. \item Same conclusions: SS show no gain, and multilepton may give marginal improvements
  112. \end{itemize}
  113. \end{frame}
  114. \begin{frame}{Conclusions}
  115. \begin{itemize}
  116. \item Investigated any benefit to including taus in measurement.
  117. \item With current tau selection no gain in SS
  118. \item Possibly very small (few percent) gain in multilepton categories
  119. \item Large amount of work needed to create data-driven estimate of fake-tau background
  120. \item Propose to document this and shelve it for now
  121. \end{itemize}
  122. \end{frame}
  123. \begin{frame}{Backup - Tau Reco Performance}
  124. \begin{columns}
  125. \begin{column}{0.5\textwidth}
  126. \begin{figure}
  127. \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figures/Tau_Efficiency.png}
  128. \end{figure}
  129. \centering
  130. Tau Selection Efficiency (reco + id + $P_T>20\mathrm{GeV}$)
  131. \end{column}
  132. \begin{column}{0.5\textwidth}
  133. \begin{figure}
  134. \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figures/Tau_Purity.png}
  135. \end{figure}
  136. \centering
  137. Tau Purity (matched w/ generator-level tau at $\delta R<0.3$)
  138. \end{column}
  139. \end{columns}
  140. \end{frame}
  141. \begin{frame}{Backup - Truth Matching Identity}
  142. \begin{figure}
  143. \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figures/Truth_Matching.png}
  144. \end{figure}
  145. \centering
  146. Tau Selection Efficiency (reco + id + $P_T>20\mathrm{GeV}$)
  147. \begin{itemize}
  148. \item \textbf{Note: } The flag for picking generator final state particles doesn't actually include the hadronic particles so it's likely that many of the ``Nothing'' taus really belong in the ``Hadron'' category. (Will be fixed in future)
  149. \end{itemize}
  150. \end{frame}
  151. \end{document}