
% rubber: module pdftex

\documentclass[english,aspectratio=43,9pt]{beamer}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{booktabs}
\usepackage{siunitx}
\usepackage{subcaption}
\usepackage{marvosym}
\usepackage{verbatim}

\newcommand{\pb}{\si{\pico\barn}}%
\newcommand{\fb}{\si{\femto\barn}}%
\newcommand{\invfb}{\si{\per\femto\barn}}
\newcommand{\GeV}{\si{\giga\electronvolt}}

\hypersetup{colorlinks=true,urlcolor=blue}

\usetheme[]{bjeldbak}

\begin{document}

\title[e Reco. Validation]{Offline Electron Seeding Validation - Update}
\author[C. Fangmeier]{\textbf{Caleb Fangmeier} \\ Ilya Kravchenko,  Greg Snow}
\institute[UNL]{University of Nebraska \-- Lincoln}
\date{August 28, 2017}

\titlegraphic{%
\begin{figure}
  \includegraphics[width=1in]{CMSlogo.png}\hspace{0.75in}\includegraphics[width=1in]{nebraska-n.png}
\end{figure}
}

\begin{frame}[noframenumbering,plain]
  \titlepage%
\end{frame}

\begin{frame}{Introduction}
  \begin{itemize}
    \item Our goal is to study \textbf{seeding} for the \textbf{offline} Gsf tracking with the \textbf{new pixel detector}.
    \item \href{https://indico.cern.ch/event/616443/contributions/2669480/attachments/1496854/2329372/main.pdf}{Previous talk} gave introduction/motivation to approach
    \item Since Then,
    \begin{itemize}
        \item Migrated Code from \texttt{8\_1\_0} to \texttt{9\_0\_2}
        \item Regenerated \texttt{trackingNtuple}s for dataset \\
          {\tiny \vspace{0.05in}\hspace{-0.2in}\texttt{/DYJetsToLL\_M-50\_TuneCUETP8M1\_13TeV-madgraphMLM-pythia8 \\
              \vspace{-0.05in}\hspace{-0.2in}/PhaseISpring17DR-FlatPU28to62HcalNZS\_90X\_upgrade2017\_realistic\_v20-v1/GEN-SIM-RAW}}
        \item Calculated $\Delta \phi_{1,2}$/$\Delta z_{1,2}$ for distances between extrapolated SC and reconstructed pixel hit
        \item In previous talk, gave distributions of the above for distances between
    \end{itemize}
  \end{itemize}
\end{frame}

\begin{frame}{First matched hit resolutions (\texttt{Simhit} \-- \texttt{RecHit})}
    \begin{figure}
      \includegraphics[height=3in]{figures/live/first_hits::rs:DY2LL@output_902results_root.png}
    \end{figure}
\end{frame}

\begin{frame}{First matched hit resolutions (SC Extrapolation)}
    \begin{figure}
      \includegraphics[height=3in]{figures/live/sc_extrapolation_first::rs:DY2LL@output_902results_root.png}
    \end{figure}
\end{frame}

\begin{frame}{second matched hit resolutions (\texttt{Simhit} \-- \texttt{RecHit})}
    \begin{figure}
      \includegraphics[height=3in]{figures/live/second_hits::rs:DY2LL@output_902results_root.png}
    \end{figure}
\end{frame}

\begin{frame}{Second matched hit resolutions (SC Extrapolation)}
    \begin{figure}
      \includegraphics[height=3in]{figures/live/sc_extrapolation_second::rs:DY2LL@output_902results_root.png}
    \end{figure}
\end{frame}

\begin{frame}{Outlook}
  \begin{itemize}
    \item Investigate spikes in $\Delta \phi_{1}$/$\Delta z_{1}$ distributions
    \item Add cross-references between SC info and matched seeds/hits to ntuple
    \item Suggestions from experts?
  \end{itemize}
\end{frame}

\end{document}
