Adds reference to dphi v ladder plots

docs/presentations/2017_07_17/main.tex

@@ -36,8 +36,8 @@
 
 \begin{frame}{Introduction}
   \begin{itemize}
-      \item Our goal is to study \textbf{seeding} for the \textbf{offline} gsf tracking with the \textbf{new pixel detector}.
-    \item Ongoing studies\footnote{\url{https://indico.cern.ch/event/613833/contributions/2646392/attachments/1486134/2307836/EGMHLT_PixelMatching_Jun30.pdf}} in HLT examine the resolution of RecHits used in GSF Tracking.
+      \item Our goal is to study \textbf{seeding} for the \textbf{offline} Gsf tracking with the \textbf{new pixel detector}.
+    \item Ongoing studies\footnote{\url{https://indico.cern.ch/event/613833/contributions/2646392/attachments/1486134/2307836/EGMHLT_PixelMatching_Jun30.pdf}} in HLT examine the resolution of RecHits used in Gsf Tracking.
     \item In those studies, the resolution is computed by measuring the distance between the \textbf{RecHits} and the extrapolated paths from ECAL \textbf{super-clusters} (SCs).
     \item For \textbf{offline} reconstruction, we compute residuals by comparing the position of \textbf{RecHits} and associated \textbf{SimHits}.
     \item Knowing these resolutions is important in choosing the size of search windows in the hit matching algorithm used in electron reconstruction.
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@
   \end{itemize}
 \end{frame}
 
-\begin{frame}{Gsf Electron Seeding}
+\begin{frame}{Gsf Electron Seeding I}
   \begin{columns}
   \begin{column}{0.75\textwidth}
     \begin{figure}
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@
   \footnotesize{Windows from \url{https://indico.cern.ch/event/611042/contributions/2464057/attachments/1406271/2148742/ElectronTracking30112016.pdf}}
 \end{frame}
 
-\begin{frame}{Gsf Electron Seeding}
+\begin{frame}{Gsf Electron Seeding II}
   \begin{columns}
   \begin{column}{0.66\textwidth}
     \begin{figure}
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@
   \end{columns}
 \end{frame}
 
-\begin{frame}{Gsf Electron Seeding}
+\begin{frame}{Gsf Electron Seeding III}
   \begin{center}
     \begin{figure}
       \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{diagrams/Gsf_Seeding3.png}
@@ -123,7 +123,6 @@ To find residuals for calculating resolutions, require a pair containing 1
       \texttt{SimTracks} associated with the original \texttt{Track}. If
       \textbf{A} exists in this set. Make a pair of \texttt{SimHit} \textbf{A}
       and \texttt{RecHit} \textbf{B}.
-    \item Go back to 1.
   \end{enumerate}
 \end{frame}
 
@@ -163,6 +162,19 @@ To find residuals for calculating resolutions, require a pair containing 1
     \end{figure}
 \end{frame}
 
+\begin{frame}{Resolution dependence on even/odd ladder number}
+    \begin{figure}
+      \centering
+      \includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{diagrams/dphi_v_ladder_dylan.png}
+    \end{figure}
+    {\small
+    \begin{itemize}
+      \item Above From Dylan Rankin's June 30 Presentation. (See slide 1)
+      \item We have slightly different definitions of $\Delta\phi_1$, but wanted to investigate ourselves.
+    \end{itemize}
+    }
+\end{frame}
+
 \begin{frame}{Resolution dependence on even/odd ladder number}
     \begin{figure}
       \centering
@@ -173,7 +185,7 @@ To find residuals for calculating resolutions, require a pair containing 1
 
 \begin{frame}{Conclusions}
   \begin{itemize}
-    \item Analysis machinery for offline electron reco studies with MC truth is in place.
+    \item Analysis machinery for offline electron RECO studies with MC truth is in place.
     \item Preliminary plots of $\Delta\phi_{1/2}$ and $\Delta z_{1/2}$ for BPIX
       Layers 1/2 are shown.
     \item Code for this analysis is here: \\ \footnotesize