|
@@ -0,0 +1,144 @@
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+% rubber: module pdftex
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+\documentclass[english,aspectratio=43,9pt]{beamer}
|
|
|
|
+\usepackage{graphicx}
|
|
|
|
+\usepackage{amssymb}
|
|
|
|
+\usepackage{booktabs}
|
|
|
|
+\usepackage{siunitx}
|
|
|
|
+\usepackage{subcaption}
|
|
|
|
+\usepackage{marvosym}
|
|
|
|
+\usepackage{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+\newcommand{\pb}{\si{\pico\barn}}%
|
|
|
|
+\newcommand{\fb}{\si{\femto\barn}}%
|
|
|
|
+\newcommand{\invfb}{\si{\per\femto\barn}}
|
|
|
|
+\newcommand{\GeV}{\si{\giga\electronvolt}}
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+\hypersetup{colorlinks=true,urlcolor=blue}
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+\usetheme[]{bjeldbak}
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+\newcommand\SmallFont{\fontsize{6}{7.2}\selectfont}
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+\begin{document}
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+\title[EGM Recom. August 2017]{EGM Recommendations, August 2017}
|
|
|
|
+\author[C. Fangmeier]{\textbf{Caleb Fangmeier} \\ Georgios Krintiras \\ Till Arndt}
|
|
|
|
+% \institute[UNL]{University of Nebraska \-- Lincoln}
|
|
|
|
+\date{August 8, 2017}
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+\titlegraphic{%
|
|
|
|
+\begin{figure}
|
|
|
|
+ \vspace{-0.5cm}
|
|
|
|
+ \includegraphics[width=0.75in]{CMSlogo.png} \\
|
|
|
|
+ \vspace{0.3cm}
|
|
|
|
+ \includegraphics[width=0.75in]{nebraska-n.png}\hspace{0.25in}
|
|
|
|
+ \includegraphics[width=0.75in]{UCLlogo.png}\hspace{0.25in}
|
|
|
|
+ \includegraphics[width=0.75in]{DESYlogo.png}
|
|
|
|
+\end{figure}
|
|
|
|
+}
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+\begin{frame}[plain]
|
|
|
|
+ \titlepage%
|
|
|
|
+\end{frame}
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+\begin{frame}{Introduction}
|
|
|
|
+ \begin{itemize}
|
|
|
|
+ \item EGM issues recommendations for
|
|
|
|
+ \begin{itemize}
|
|
|
|
+ \item Identification, both cut-based and MVA
|
|
|
|
+ \item Efficiency scale factors
|
|
|
|
+ \item Energy Calculation (Regression)
|
|
|
|
+ \item Energy scale factors and smearing for MC
|
|
|
|
+ \end{itemize}
|
|
|
|
+ \item For 2016 Data, ``Ultimate'' recommendations are available.
|
|
|
|
+ \item For 2017 Data, there are initial recommendations \alert{but many have not yet converged.}
|
|
|
|
+ \item As this is just a 10 min talk, I'll mostly just be pointing to various talks/TWikis with more information.
|
|
|
|
+ \end{itemize}
|
|
|
|
+\end{frame}
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+\begin{frame}{Electron Identification \-- Cut Based}
|
|
|
|
+ \begin{columns} \begin{column}{0.5\textwidth}
|
|
|
|
+ \begin{itemize}
|
|
|
|
+ \item Four available working points
|
|
|
|
+ \begin{itemize}
|
|
|
|
+ \item Veto (eff. $\sim 95\%$)
|
|
|
|
+ \item Loose (eff. $\sim 90\%$)
|
|
|
|
+ \item Medium (eff. $\sim 80\%$)
|
|
|
|
+ \item Tight (eff. $\sim 70\%$)
|
|
|
|
+ \end{itemize}
|
|
|
|
+ \item The 80X-tuned ID is recommended for 2016 data.
|
|
|
|
+ \item For now, the same holds for 2017 data. New IDs will be tuned when more data is available. (expected by end of the year)
|
|
|
|
+ \item See Ilya's \href{https://indico.cern.ch/event/647765/contributions/2632811/attachments/1480145/2294932/talk_egmIDs_on_90X.pdf}{talk} for more information on 2016 IDs with 2017 MC.
|
|
|
|
+ \item {\footnotesize \url{twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMS/CutBasedElectronIdentificationRun2}}
|
|
|
|
+ \end{itemize}
|
|
|
|
+ \end{column} \begin{column}{0.5\textwidth}
|
|
|
|
+ \begin{figure}
|
|
|
|
+ \vspace{-.5in}
|
|
|
|
+ \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figures/electron_cuts.png}
|
|
|
|
+ \end{figure}
|
|
|
|
+ \end{column} \end{columns}
|
|
|
|
+\end{frame}
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+\begin{frame}{Electron Identification \-- MVA}
|
|
|
|
+ \begin{itemize}
|
|
|
|
+ \item For most analyses, the ``General Purpose MVA'' is recommended.
|
|
|
|
+ \item There is also a more specialized ``HZZ MVA'' developed for the ICHEP 2016 HZZ result specialized for running at very high efficiencies. ($\sim 98\%$)
|
|
|
|
+ \item Two specified working points
|
|
|
|
+ \begin{itemize}
|
|
|
|
+ \item WP80 (eff. $\sim 80\%$)
|
|
|
|
+ \item WP90 (eff. $\sim 90\%$)
|
|
|
|
+ \end{itemize}
|
|
|
|
+ \item Tested on 2017 MC samples and shows reasonable performance,
|
|
|
|
+ \item {\footnotesize \url{twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMS/MultivariateElectronIdentificationRun2}}
|
|
|
|
+ \end{itemize}
|
|
|
|
+ \begin{figure}
|
|
|
|
+ \includegraphics[width=0.75\textwidth]{figures/MVA_performance.png}
|
|
|
|
+ \end{figure}
|
|
|
|
+\end{frame}
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+\begin{frame}{Electron Identification \-- HEEP (high energy)}
|
|
|
|
+ \begin{itemize}
|
|
|
|
+ \item Specialized ID for very high energy ($\sim 1$TeV) electrons.
|
|
|
|
+ \item As of August 1, HEEP V70 is the recommended version
|
|
|
|
+ \item Implemented in the VID (versioned identification) Framework. See TWiki for instructions on usage/integration.
|
|
|
|
+ \item \url{twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMS/HEEPElectronIdentificationRun2}
|
|
|
|
+ \end{itemize}
|
|
|
|
+\end{frame}
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+\begin{frame}{Photon Identification}
|
|
|
|
+ \begin{itemize}
|
|
|
|
+ \item Recommendations are similar to electrons.
|
|
|
|
+ \item See relevant TWiki pages for details.
|
|
|
|
+ \begin{itemize}
|
|
|
|
+ \item \url{twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMS/CutBasedPhotonIdentificationRun2}
|
|
|
|
+ \item \url{twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMS/MultivariatePhotonIdentificationRun2}
|
|
|
|
+ \end{itemize}
|
|
|
|
+ \end{itemize}
|
|
|
|
+\end{frame}
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+\begin{frame}{Efficiency and Scale Factors}
|
|
|
|
+ \begin{itemize}
|
|
|
|
+ \item Available for 2016 data for all mentioned IDs.
|
|
|
|
+ \item Moriond 2017 recommendations are most current for 2016 data.
|
|
|
|
+ \item For 2017 data, scale factors will likely be different. EGM will publish updated numbers shortly after 2017 IDs are finalized.
|
|
|
|
+ \item Instructions: \url{twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/viewauth/CMS/EgammaIDRecipesRun2} \\ Under \textbf{Electron/Photon efficiencies and scale factors}
|
|
|
|
+ \item More Details: \url{twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMS/ElectronScaleFactorsRun2}
|
|
|
|
+ \end{itemize}
|
|
|
|
+\end{frame}
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+\begin{frame}{Energy Regression, \& MC Energy Scale Correction \& Smearing}
|
|
|
|
+ \begin{itemize}
|
|
|
|
+ \item Latest recommendation for 2016 data is still the Moriond 2017 recommendation. (See TWiki)
|
|
|
|
+ \item Still unavailable for 2017 data, stay tuned for announcements.
|
|
|
|
+ \item In mean time, recommendation for 2017 data is to use electrons and photons from standard collections.
|
|
|
|
+ \item \url{twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/viewauth/CMS/EGMRegression}
|
|
|
|
+ \item \url{twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/viewauth/CMS/EGMSmearer}
|
|
|
|
+ \end{itemize}
|
|
|
|
+\end{frame}
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+\end{document}
|