|
|
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
|
|
|
\title[e Reco. Validation]{Offline Electron Reconstruction Validation}
|
|
|
\author[C. Fangmeier]{\textbf{Caleb Fangmeier}\\ Ilya Kravchenko}
|
|
|
\institute[UNL]{University of Nebraska \-- Lincoln}
|
|
|
-\date{\today}
|
|
|
+\date{July 17, 2017}
|
|
|
|
|
|
\titlegraphic{%
|
|
|
\begin{figure}
|
|
|
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
|
|
|
\item Ongoing studies\footnote{\url{https://indico.cern.ch/event/613833/contributions/2646392/attachments/1486134/2307836/EGMHLT_PixelMatching_Jun30.pdf}} in HLT examine the resolution of RecHits used in GSF Tracking
|
|
|
\item In those studies, the resolution is computed by measuring the distance between the RecHits and the extrapolated paths from ECAL super-clusters (SCs).
|
|
|
\item For offline reconstruction, we compute residuals by comparing the position of RecHits and associated SimHits.
|
|
|
+ \item Knowing these resolutions is important in choosing the size of search windows in the k
|
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
|
\end{frame}
|
|
|
|
Caleb Fangmeier