updates to reccomendations presentation

docs/presentations/2017_08_08/main.tex

@@ -49,10 +49,10 @@
   \begin{itemize}
     \item EGM issues recommendations for
       \begin{itemize}
-        \item Identification, both cut-based and MVA
-        \item Efficiency scale factors
         \item Energy Calculation (Regression)
         \item Energy scale factors and smearing for MC
+        \item Identification, both cut-based and MVA
+        \item Efficiency scale factors
       \end{itemize}
     \item For 2016 Data, ``Ultimate'' recommendations are available.
     \item For 2017 Data, there are initial recommendations \alert{but many have not yet converged.}
@@ -60,6 +60,16 @@
   \end{itemize}
 \end{frame}
 
+\begin{frame}{Energy Regression, \& MC Energy Scale Correction \& Smearing}
+  \begin{itemize}
+    \item Latest recommendation for 2016 data is still the Moriond 2017 recommendation. (See TWiki)
+    \item Still unavailable for 2017 data, stay tuned for announcements.
+    \item In mean time, recommendation for 2017 data is to use electrons and photons from standard collections.
+    \item \url{twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/viewauth/CMS/EGMRegression}
+    \item \url{twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/viewauth/CMS/EGMSmearer}
+  \end{itemize}
+\end{frame}
+
 \begin{frame}{Electron Identification \-- Cut Based}
   \begin{columns} \begin{column}{0.5\textwidth}
     \begin{itemize}
@@ -93,6 +103,7 @@
           \item WP90 (eff. $\sim 90\%$)
         \end{itemize}
     \item Tested on 2017 MC samples and shows reasonable performance,
+    \item However, stated WP efficiencies tend to be shifted along the ROC curve.
     \item {\footnotesize \url{twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMS/MultivariateElectronIdentificationRun2}}
   \end{itemize}
   \begin{figure}
@@ -118,6 +129,9 @@
             \item \url{twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMS/MultivariatePhotonIdentificationRun2}
         \end{itemize}
   \end{itemize}
+  \vspace{0.8in}
+  \centering
+  \alert{Starting in \texttt{9\_2\_2}, all 2016 IDs (for electrons \emph{and} photons) are in CMSSW (no private branch merges!)}
 \end{frame}
 
 \begin{frame}{Efficiency and Scale Factors}
@@ -130,15 +144,14 @@
   \end{itemize}
 \end{frame}
 
-
-\begin{frame}{Energy Regression, \& MC Energy Scale Correction \& Smearing}
+\begin{frame}{Summary}
   \begin{itemize}
-    \item Latest recommendation for 2016 data is still the Moriond 2017 recommendation. (See TWiki)
-    \item Still unavailable for 2017 data, stay tuned for announcements.
-    \item In mean time, recommendation for 2017 data is to use electrons and photons from standard collections.
-    \item \url{twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/viewauth/CMS/EGMRegression}
-    \item \url{twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/viewauth/CMS/EGMSmearer}
+    \item For now, keep using 2016 recipes and constants (fully in CMSSW since \texttt{9\_2\_2}).
+    \item \emph{Be mindful that oddities are possible since these have not been exercised on real data so far}.
+    \item New recommendations are expected late fall once sufficient data for Z calibrations are collected
+    \item Any questions can be directed new contact Caleb Fangmeier \url{caleb@fangmeier.tech}.
   \end{itemize}
 \end{frame}
 
+
 \end{document}